In continuation of my last post Trouble Ticket 1 , following is another trouble ticket related to NAT. Please find the details below :
Task : In this example we have configured NAT on SITE1 router to translate hosts going out from inside network. This is simplest for of NAT but for some reason the end to end ping is not working. Following you can see network diagram and configurations :
SITE 1: interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ! interface FastEthernet1/0 ip address 184.108.40.206 255.255.255.0 ip nat outside ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 FastEthernet1/0 ! ip nat inside source static 10.10.10.2 100.100.100.1
Site 2: interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 220.127.116.11 255.255.255.0 ! interface FastEthernet1/0 ip address 18.104.22.168 255.255.255.0 !ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 FastEthernet1/0
Following are the configuration on hosts…
HOST 1:interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 ! ip default-gateway 10.10.10.1 !no ip routing Host 2: interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 22.214.171.124 255.255.255.0 ! ip default-gateway 126.96.36.199 ! no ip routing
Now lets check the connectivity. We will try to ping host 2 from host 1. The configuration is very simple and it should work…
HOST1#ping 188.8.131.52 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 184.108.40.206, timeout is 2 seconds: ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
Unfortunately it did not work. Now we need to check what is wrong, following are few things which must check .
1- Is NAT working fine ? Lest check this…
There is just one router which is responsible for NAT , SITE 1 router. We will check SITE 1 router if NAT is working fine or NOT.
SITE1#show ip nat translations Pro Inside global Inside local Outside local Outside global icmp 100.100.100.1:47 10.10.10.2:47 220.127.116.11:47 18.104.22.168:47 --- 100.100.100.1 10.10.10.2 --- --- SITE1#show ip nat statistics Total active translations: 1 (1 static, 0 dynamic; 0 extended) Peak translations: 18, occurred 00:15:14 ago Outside interfaces: FastEthernet1/0 Inside interfaces: FastEthernet0/0 Hits: 385 Misses: 0 CEF Translated packets: 380, CEF Punted packets: 5 Expired translations: 17 Dynamic mappings: Appl doors: 0 Normal doors: 0 Queued Packets: 0
2- Now if the NAT is working there is just one more feature implemented in this network which is routing. So if all the physical infrastructure(interface issues etc) is fine then issue could be with forwarding. So lets check routing and to do that we will use most useful and traditional tool “traceroute”, lets trace the HOST2 ip from HOST 1.
HOST1#traceroute 22.214.171.124 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 126.96.36.199 1 10.10.10.1 48 msec 32 msec 92 msec 2 * * * 3 * HOST1#
Alright, so we have an observation here that the packet is not going our of SITE1 router. Now this is another level of isolation, we have isolated the issue to SITE1 router. Lets see if we have forwarding tables fine in the router. Below output shows that cef entry for 188.8.131.52 is present…
SITE1#sh ip cef 184.108.40.206 220.127.116.11/32 attached to FastEthernet1/0
We can further run debugs on router to check what exactly is happening with ICMP echo request but debug can be cryptic at times so I prefer taking simple packet capture between SITE 1 and SITE 2 router to see if we have some clue.
Wow!!! that is the reason I prefer to take packet capture whenever I am stuck while troubleshooting. The best thing about the packet capture is that even you do not find anything relevant to the issue you are troubleshooting, you get to know the network activities very well which intern adds to your knowledge and also helps you to conclude the issue soon. But our case is fortunately more simpler…Because we clearly see what is happening here. SITE 1 router is sending ICMP packet out and we do not see any response coming from other end. And what we see coming is ARP request for 100.100.100.1 IP address which is the translated IP here. Below is the way packet is getting translated with our configuration:
We see the SITE 2 router is sending ARP for 100.100.100.1 but there is no response for that because there is no IP address in the network which has this IP address, 100.100.100.1 is just defined is NAT statement there is no actual host in the network which holds this so nobody is responding to ARP response. But why the SITE 2 router is sending ARP request for 100.100.100.1 ? The reason behind this is the route statement that we have configured.
SITE1(Config)#ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 FastEthernet1/0
Keep a note of it that whenever we define a static route with the exit interface router has to do arp for all the destination IP addresses. This also adds extra overhead on the router in terms of CPU Cycles. Lets see if we see any improvement in our issue if remove exit interface with next hop IP address.
SITE1(Config)#ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 18.104.22.168
SITE2 (Config)#ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 22.214.171.124
HOST1#ping 126.96.36.199 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 188.8.131.52, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 36/47/64 ms Router#
Neat!!! As soon as we changed the route to next hop IP address we see the ping is working. See the packet capture below, there is no ARP now.
That is all with this trouble ticket, hope you have learnt something. Please leave your suggestions or questions in Comment section, I would love to hear from you.
Thanks , stay Tuned for more.